A recent ruling from the Commonwealth Court overturning a Monroe County judge’s decision, which allowed the state to seize $15,000 hidden in a rental car, makes one thing clear: Just because something might smell like drug activity, doesn’t make it so.

A three-judge panel decided the totality of circumstances in Commonwealth v. $15,000 U.S. Currency — drug records for both the car’s driver and its passenger, a positive canine and ion scan of the cash, inconsistent testimony and the “overwhelming smell of marijuana” emanating from the money — did not establish a nexus between the money and illegal activity.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]