An offender’s acceptance into Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition for a second DUI charge triggers the recidivist requirement for installing an ignition interlock system in one’s car, a sharply divided state Supreme Court has ruled.
A 4-3 panel held that, while accepting ARD did not constitute a DUI conviction, the statute’s language should nonetheless be construed to mean that taking the rehabilitative program establishes a violation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
