Based on expert medical testimony, as a whole, the court concluded that the workers' compensation judge and the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board erred in concluding that such testimony was equivocal. Reversed and remanded for a calculation of claimant's benefits.
January 10, 2012 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Bemis v. Workers’ Comp. Appeal Bd., PICS Case No. 12-0002 (Pa. Commw. Dec. 27, 2011) McCullough, J. (8 pages).
Based on expert medical testimony, as a whole, the court concluded that the workers’ compensation judge and the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board erred in concluding that such testimony was equivocal. Reversed and remanded for a calculation of claimant’s benefits.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
parkingticket.com is the world-leader in local, municipal compliance. Whether it be a food delivery, or a fine bottle of wine being delive...
The Partners Group is currently recruiting a VP of Legal for our burgeoning client, a real estate investment firm in Atlanta, GA. The firm h...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a patent associate for its Intellectual Property Practice Group. Candidates should have supe...
