The court granted defendants' preliminary objections for lack of personal jurisdiction since the activities of the two defendants did not evidence a continuous and systematic doing of business in Pennsylvania. Affirmance recommended.
January 24, 2012 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Mendel v. Williams, PICS Case No. 12-0105 (C.P. Philadelphia Dec. 21, 2011) Tereshko, J. (14 pages).
The court granted defendants’ preliminary objections for lack of personal jurisdiction since the activities of the two defendants did not evidence a continuous and systematic doing of business in Pennsylvania. Affirmance recommended.
Presented by BigVoodoo
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Eichen Crutchlow Zaslow LLP is a highly regarded legal firm based in Edison, New Jersey. The firm specializes in medical malpractice and per...
The George Washington University Law School invites applications for multiple tenure-track or tenured faculty appointments, at the rank of A...
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has an immediate opening for experienced Employment Attorneys in its Los Angeles and Ventura offices. Candida...
