The court granted defendants' preliminary objections for lack of personal jurisdiction since the activities of the two defendants did not evidence a continuous and systematic doing of business in Pennsylvania. Affirmance recommended.
January 24, 2012 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Mendel v. Williams, PICS Case No. 12-0105 (C.P. Philadelphia Dec. 21, 2011) Tereshko, J. (14 pages).
The court granted defendants’ preliminary objections for lack of personal jurisdiction since the activities of the two defendants did not evidence a continuous and systematic doing of business in Pennsylvania. Affirmance recommended.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Description:NFSA has a great opportunity for a Labor Relations Associate and Junior Counsel. This position will support NFSA's collective ba...
McCarter & English, LLP is seeking litigation attorneys for our Newark, NJ offices. Candidates must have 3-6 years of law firm experien...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a corporate associate for its office located in Boston, MA. Candidate must have 2 - 5 years ...
