A Pennsylvania-based construction products manufacturer may not hit up the city of Wilkes-Barre for a seven-digit debt owed to it by the city’s redevelopment authority, the Commonwealth Court has ruled.

A three-judge panel concluded the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil to be “wholly inapplicable” to the relationship between a city and its redevelopment authorities because such a maneuver was designed to circumvent the statutory shield that protects equity holders from liability. Equity holders and the city in this case, Judge Robert Simpson said in a 15-page opinion, could not be construed as the same thing.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]