The post-polygraph interrogation constituted a "new interrogation" and exceeded the scope of the original Miranda warnings and appellant's counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress his post-polygraph statement. PCRA court's order denying appellant's petition for relief reversed.
March 13, 2012 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Commonwealth v. Hill, PICS Case No. 12-0500(Pa. Super. March 1, 2012) Donohue, J.; Panella, J., dissenting (30 pages).
The post-polygraph interrogation constituted a “new interrogation” and exceeded the scope of the original Miranda warnings and appellant’s counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress his post-polygraph statement. PCRA court’s order denying appellant’s petition for relief reversed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
We are seeking two attorneys with a minimum of two to three years of experience to join our prominent and thriving education law practice in...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York office for a Real Estate Litigation Associate with three to six years of commerci...
Downtown NY property and casualty defense law firm seeks a Litigation Associate with 3+ years' experience to become a part of our team! You ...
