Based on the contracts between the parties, defendant's right to challenge allegedly overpaid invoices expired and unjust enrichment claims were not proper where there was a written agreement. Defendant's counterclaims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment were dismissed.
March 27, 2012 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Clinlogix v. Numoda Corp., PICS Case No. 12-0596 (C.P. Philadelphia Feb. 24, 2012) Snite, J. (9 pages).
Based on the contracts between the parties, defendant’s right to challenge allegedly overpaid invoices expired and unjust enrichment claims were not proper where there was a written agreement. Defendant’s counterclaims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment were dismissed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated associate attorneys for several positions. Candidates must be admi...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a litigator with at least 2-4 years of experience in all aspects of commercial litigation (i.e., depositions and ...
A prestigious matrimonial law firm in Garden City is seeking a skilled Associate Attorney with 5 to 7 years of experience in family law. The...
