COMMONWEALTH COURT
LAND USE AND PLANNING
Dimensional Variance vs. Use Variance Unreasonable Hardship Substantial Evidence
In re Appeal of Towamencin Twp., PICS Case No. 12-0666 (Pa. Commw. April 3, 2012) Colins, J. (14 pages).
Substantial evidence existed that denial of a use variance would result in an unreasonable hardship upon the property owner if it were required to be in strict compliance with the zoning requirements with respect to the construction of a silo with a wireless antenna array and equipment shed. Order granting dimensional variance affirmed.
April 17, 2012 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
COMMONWEALTH COURT
In re Appeal of Towamencin Twp., PICS Case No. 12-0666 (Pa. Commw. April 3, 2012) Colins, J. (14 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Boutique Law Firm in Englewood Cliffs, NJ is seeking an Experienced Commercial Real Estate/Transactional Attorney for a full-time position. ...
Boutique Law Firm in Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey is seeking a Litigation Associate NJ Bar admission required. NY admission a plus but is no...
AttorneyJob Code: LEP023Pay Grade: NFLSA Status: ExemptLegal UnitJob Description:This position reports directly to the Chief Legal Officer, ...