The Pittsburgh Steelers do not have to pay the attorney fees related to a former player’s workers’ compensation case because, though he clearly suffered injuries while with the team, the team reasonably argued he was not disabled as he went on to play for other pro teams, the Commonwealth Court ruled.

Pennsylvania law automatically provides attorney fees to prevailing claimants when employers contest a claim for workers’ compensation benefits unless that contest is reasonable. In the case of Iwuoma v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board , a three-judge panel of the Commonwealth Court found the Steelers had a viable reason to contest former player Chidi F. Iwuoma’s claims of disability.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]