I am turning from this column’s monthly attorney liability analysis to the perhaps more interesting issue of judicial recusal. That is, when must an attorney in performance of his or her duty of zealous advocacy seek recusal of the presiding judge, and how?
Since recusal in Pennsylvania is a concept of common law as opposed to federal statutory mandate, we will begin answering this difficult question with a common law analysis.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
