After a year in which its output was dramatically down, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court rebounded in 2011, issuing opinions at a rate closer to the high court’s traditional performance marks.
But the court’s chief justice said that numbers were not a perfect measuring stick for the court’s productivity, adding that a number of factors can slow or speed up the high court’s output.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
