The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of defendants where the Eckenrod threshold was not met in this asbestos exposure case. Motions for summary judgment in favor of defendants affirmed.
June 12, 2012 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
SUPERIOR COURT
Fisher v. Sexauer, PICS Case No. 12-1036 (Pa. Super. May 29, 2012) Bender, J. (17 pages).
The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of defendants where the Eckenrod threshold was not met in this asbestos exposure case. Motions for summary judgment in favor of defendants affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
parkingticket.com is the world-leader in local, municipal compliance. Whether if be a food delivery, or a fine bottle of wine being delive...
The Partners Group is currently recruiting a VP of Legal for our burgeoning client, a real estate investment firm in Atlanta, GA. The firm h...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a patent associate for its Intellectual Property Practice Group. Candidates should have supe...
