Defendant had the burden of proving that payment of the agreed-upon settlement amount was conditioned upon defendant's receipt of a non-lien letter. A rule was issued to show cause why plaintiff's petition to enforce settlement should not be granted.
June 12, 2012 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
COURTS OF COMMON PLEAS
Wimberly v. Katruska, PICS Case No. 12-1060 (C.P. Allegheny May 23, 2012) Wettick, J. (8 pages).
Defendant had the burden of proving that payment of the agreed-upon settlement amount was conditioned upon defendant’s receipt of a non-lien letter. A rule was issued to show cause why plaintiff’s petition to enforce settlement should not be granted.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Note: This position is hybrid, however, it is discretionary, and the office location is in Bradenton, Florida.Note: The salary range reflect...
Litigation defense commercial casualty/complex catastrophic cases. Flexible schedule with work in Philadelphia, Conshohocken, and/or remot...
Our close client, an electric cooperative, is seeking to hire a Vice President General Counsel to lead its legal function. Hired attorney ...
