Defendant had the burden of proving that payment of the agreed-upon settlement amount was conditioned upon defendant's receipt of a non-lien letter. A rule was issued to show cause why plaintiff's petition to enforce settlement should not be granted.
June 12, 2012 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
COURTS OF COMMON PLEAS
Wimberly v. Katruska, PICS Case No. 12-1060 (C.P. Allegheny May 23, 2012) Wettick, J. (8 pages).
Defendant had the burden of proving that payment of the agreed-upon settlement amount was conditioned upon defendant’s receipt of a non-lien letter. A rule was issued to show cause why plaintiff’s petition to enforce settlement should not be granted.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Title: Legal Counsel Reports to: Chief Executive Officer (CEO) FLSA Status: Exempt, Full Time Supervisory Responsibility: N/A Location: Remo...
Blume Forte Fried Zerres and Molinari 1 Main Street Chatham, NJ 07945Prominent Morris County Law Firm with a state-wide personal injury prac...
d Arcambal Ousley & Cuyler Burk, LLP, a well-established women-owned litigation firm, has an opening in our Parsippany, NJ office. We of...
