The state Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether a freight railroad should bear a portion of the cost to remove a bridge that hovers over a highway crossing it uses but does not own.
A three-judge Commonwealth Court panel, in an unpublished memorandum opinion, ruled last December that a decade-old case from another panel in which the court refused to allocate cost to a railroad that did not own property at the underlying cross was controlling.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
