The court properly concluded that insurers had a duty to defend their insured where the allegations in the underlying personal injury complaint fell within the scope of the insurers' policies. Affirmance recommended.
August 28, 2012 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
COURTS OF COMMON PLEAS
Harleysville Mut. Ins. Co. v. Established Traffic Control Inc., PICS Case No. 12-1517 (C.P. Bucks July 10, 2012) Mellon, J. (19 pages).
The court properly concluded that insurers had a duty to defend their insured where the allegations in the underlying personal injury complaint fell within the scope of the insurers’ policies. Affirmance recommended.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Litigation defense commercial casualty/complex catastrophic cases. Flexible schedule with work in Philadelphia, Conshohocken, and/or remot...
Our close client, an electric cooperative, is seeking to hire a Vice President General Counsel to lead its legal function. Hired attorney ...
POSITION SUMMARY The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey is seeking a Temporary Law Clerk for the period December 16...
