APPEALS
Pro Se Filings Violation of Appellate Rules of Procedure Cognizable Arguments Permitted
Richardson v. Pennsylvania Ins. Dep’t, PICS Case No. 12-1768 (Pa. Commw. Sept. 12, 2012) Covey, J. (14 pages).
Although petitioner's pro se brief did not comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, the court found meaningful review was not precluded; the court determined that petitioner's provisional property insurance policy was properly cancelled. Affirmed.
October 02, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
APPEALS
Pro Se Filings Violation of Appellate Rules of Procedure Cognizable Arguments Permitted
Richardson v. Pennsylvania Ins. Dep’t, PICS Case No. 12-1768 (Pa. Commw. Sept. 12, 2012) Covey, J. (14 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated associate attorneys for several positions. Candidates must be admi...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a litigator with at least 2-4 years of experience in all aspects of commercial litigation (i.e., depositions and ...
A prestigious matrimonial law firm in Garden City is seeking a skilled Associate Attorney with 5 to 7 years of experience in family law. The...