APPEALS
Pro Se Filings Violation of Appellate Rules of Procedure Cognizable Arguments Permitted
Richardson v. Pennsylvania Ins. Dep’t, PICS Case No. 12-1768 (Pa. Commw. Sept. 12, 2012) Covey, J. (14 pages).
Although petitioner's pro se brief did not comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, the court found meaningful review was not precluded; the court determined that petitioner's provisional property insurance policy was properly cancelled. Affirmed.
October 02, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
APPEALS
Pro Se Filings Violation of Appellate Rules of Procedure Cognizable Arguments Permitted
Richardson v. Pennsylvania Ins. Dep’t, PICS Case No. 12-1768 (Pa. Commw. Sept. 12, 2012) Covey, J. (14 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Eichen Crutchlow Zaslow LLP is a highly regarded legal firm based in Edison, New Jersey. The firm specializes in medical malpractice and per...
The George Washington University Law School invites applications for multiple tenure-track or tenured faculty appointments, at the rank of A...
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has an immediate opening for experienced Employment Attorneys in its Los Angeles and Ventura offices. Candida...