Plaintiff did not prevail in his action under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act because the hospital established that it applied its policies appropriately and that plaintiff received similar treatment in comparison to other patients. Defendant's motion for summary judgment granted.
October 02, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
TORTS
Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act Appropriate Medical Screening Private Cause of Action Appropriate Policies Similar Treatment
Byrne v. Chester County Hospital, PICS Case No. 12-1821 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 18, 2012) Pratter, J. (9 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
TIRED OF LAW? MOTIVATED REAL ESTATE AGENTS FOR F/T POSITION WITH TOP RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE TEAM AT BROWN HARRIS STEVENS RESIDENTIAL SALE...
Zeisler & Zeisler, P.C., a highly-regarded corporate restructuring, bankruptcy and commercial litigation boutique, seeks an attorney to ...
General Counsel Posting Number: 1925 Closing Date: Location: Oakland, CA (Hybrid) The Public Health Institute (PHI) is an in...
