Many of the ADR articles that have appeared in The Legal over the past few years have highlighted the often-blurred understanding in statutes and court decisions of the concept of confidentiality as it relates to mediation.
Often, “confidentiality” has been characterized simply as an evidentiary privilege, created by statute, rule or court decision, with respect to any mediation communication. The Pennsylvania mediation statute is typical of many that have been adopted in other states. Although bearing the caption “confidential mediation communications and documents,” it is limited to creating a privilege against the admissibility of such evidence “in any action or proceeding, including, but not limited to, a judicial, administrative or arbitration action or proceeding.” Moreover, “disclosure of mediation communication or documents may not be required or compelled through discovery or other process.” Beyond prohibiting the discoverability of such mediation communications or their use as evidence in a proceeding, the statute imposes no restrictions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
