A medical malpractice defendant does not have to object to the qualifications of a plaintiffs expert through a pretrial motion under the MCARE Act, the state Supreme Court has ruled.
Justice Thomas G. Saylor, writing for a unanimous Supreme Court, said that nothing in the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Act prevented a health care provider who is being sued from objecting to an expert immediately following questioning that expert at trial.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
