The court found the requested punitive fine was improper because there was no harm to the borough and because landowner derived no economic benefit from his violation and brought his property into compliance within the timetable demanded by the borough. Affirmed.
January 08, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
LAND USE & PLANNING
Zoning Civil Penalty Judgment Monetary Fine Municipalities Planning Code
Loganville Borough v. Godfrey, PICS Case No. 13-0051 (Pa. Commw. Dec. 27, 2012) Leavitt, J.; Brobson, J., dissenting (10 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a full-time regular Judicial Secretary I, Judic...
The County is looking for a skilled and seasoned County Attorney to oversee the Law Department in delivering top-tier legal services, repres...
Position Summary: The Corporate General Counsel will manage and coordinate all legal and compliance matters affecting the company. The Gen...
