To say that the Commonwealth Court case of DePue v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (N. Paone Construction) is troubling is a vast understatement. The court sets a very dangerous precedent regarding the finality of the compromise and release agreement (C&R), which warrants great attention on the part of the claimant’s practitioner when preparing the agreement. Moreover, it may have a chilling effect on settlements, given the great specificity of the settlement language that the decision imposes.
A C&R agreement under Section 449 of the state Workers’ Compensation Act permits the parties to enter into an agreement that finally resolves any and all issues raised in a workers’ compensation case, including future medical treatment. While increasingly rare, the parties can choose to "leave medicals open" by simply agreeing to a C&R of indemnity only. DePue presents a situation where the parties settled only the indemnity portion of the claim.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
