As the sole remaining plaintiff in a suit alleging widespread workplace harassment gears up for trial, a federal judge restricted the amount of evidence the plaintiff is allowed to present regarding the defendant’s relationships with co-workers.
Michael Weidman’s two earlier workplace romances are too far removed, having happened over a decade ago, to be relevant, said U.S. District Judge Christopher Conner of the Middle District of Pennsylvania. However, he held that testimony from the ex-husband of the company’s executive director, Anne Vogt, about his wife’s affair with Weidman and the use of her child’s cellphone in tracing her to Weidman’s home would be relevant and admissible.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
