There were questions of fact regarding whether plaintiffs, former railroad workers, exercised reasonable diligence in ascertaining their pulmonary injuries and their operative causes, barring summary judgment on statute of limitations grounds. Motions for summary judgment denied part.
February 26, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
CIVIL PRACTICE
FELA • Statute of Limitations • Occupational Disease • Tolling Provision • Discovery Rule • Reasonable Diligence
Fraynert v. Del. & Hudson Ry. Co., Inc., PICS Case No. 13-0360 (C.P. Lackawanna Jan. 13, 2013) Nealon, J. (23 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Company DescriptionA prominent boutique AV rated Education Law firm located in Westbury, New York. Our firm specializes in education law, sp...
Seeking motivated and skilled litigation attorney to join our dynamic defense litigation firm. Role Involves:Conducting thorough research.Ha...
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...
