The trial court properly found that aunt did not fall into any of the three categories of standing to intervene in minor child's dependency proceedings, nor did she qualify for in loco parentis standing. Trial court's order affirmed.
March 05, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
FAMILY LAW
Dependency Proceedings • Juvenile Act • Standing • Motion to Intervene
In the Interest of G.D., PICS Case No. 13-0392 (Pa. Super. Feb. 15, 2013) Olson, J. (20 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Company DescriptionA prominent boutique AV rated Education Law firm located in Westbury, New York. Our firm specializes in education law, sp...
Seeking motivated and skilled litigation attorney to join our dynamic defense litigation firm. Role Involves:Conducting thorough research.Ha...
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...
