In litigation over "stacking" uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage in Pennsylvania, lawyers would be remiss not to prominently cite Sackett v. Nationwide Mutual and its progeny of three state appellate court rulings.
And while the state Superior Court did just that in a recent case, the majority of the split three-judge panel declined to rely solely upon the Sackett line of reasoning, looking also to the policy’s terms and conditions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
