A hotly contested asbestos case that started with the plaintiff making a now-withdrawn allegation of ex parte judicial intervention on the verdict sheet ended up in the state Superior Court on Tuesday with arguments over whether the trial judge had jurisdiction to order a mistrial.
Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Senior Judge Esther R. Sylvester said in her opinion required under appellate procedural rules that she declared a mistrial in a hotly contested asbestos case because the defendants sent a copy of their motion for her recusal to the administrative judge of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas’ trial division.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
