The collective bargaining agreement in this union dispute was not so free from ambiguity regarding the company's exclusive right to schedule its workforce such that the arbitrator's inquiry into past practice and introduction of extrinsic evidence were not permissible; the arbitrator found a binding past practice was established and the district court should not have disturbed the award. Judgment of district court reversed.
April 16, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
LABOR & EMPLOYMENT
Union • Collective Bargaining Agreement • Past Practice • Zipper Clause • Arbitration
Akers Nat’l Roll Co. v. Allied Indus. & Serv. Workers Int’l Union, PICS Case No. 13-0816 (3d Cir. April 4, 2013) Aldisert, J. (22 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
AMENDED NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE VACANCIES DISTRICT OF UTAH The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applicati...
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...
