A federal judge has refused to dismiss a class action suit against Bank of America, its home loan and reinsurance subsidiaries and a number of private mortgage insurers, instead directing the parties to develop a record on the issue of whether the statute of limitations should be equitably tolled based on the plaintiffs’ claims that the defendants allegedly engaged in a scheme to use mortgage insurance premiums to fund illegal kickbacks to lenders.
In Riddle v. Bank of America Corp., U.S. District Judge Berle M. Schiller of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania said the plaintiffs alleged facts sufficient to defeat the defendants’ motions to dismiss at the current stage of the litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
