Nomination papers filed by 39 candidates for election to a government study commission were flawed because they did not include acceptance by candidate oaths, but the court granted the candidates leave to file the proper oaths, nunc pro tunc, and overruled remaining objections to the papers.
April 30, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
ELECTION & POLITICAL LAW
Home Rule Charter & Optional Plans Law • Government Study Commissions • Ballot Referenda • Elected Officers • Reasonable Reliance
In re Objection to Nomination Paper of Marie Schumacher, PICS Case No. 13-0722 (C.P. Lackawanna March 22, 2013) Nealon, J. (25 pages)
Presented by BigVoodoo
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Litigation defense commercial casualty/complex catastrophic cases. Flexible schedule with work in Philadelphia, Conshohocken, and/or remot...
Our close client, an electric cooperative, is seeking to hire a Vice President General Counsel to lead its legal function. Hired attorney ...
POSITION SUMMARY The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey is seeking a Temporary Law Clerk for the period December 16...
