CRIMINAL LAW
Right to Counsel • Sufficiency of Evidence • Conspiracy • Active Participant • Overt Act
Commonwealth v. Smith, PICS Case No. 13-1047 (Pa. Super. May 1, 2013) Wecht, J. (17 pages).
The evidence proved that appellant was an active participant in the conspiracy and was sufficient to support the reasonable inference that damage to parked vehicles was caused by appellant during the chase, but the trial court prevented appellant from asserting which right he sought to invoke, i.e., whether he sought to assert his right to represent himself or to seek appointment of new counsel. Judgment of sentence vacated.
May 14, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
CRIMINAL LAW
Right to Counsel • Sufficiency of Evidence • Conspiracy • Active Participant • Overt Act
Commonwealth v. Smith, PICS Case No. 13-1047 (Pa. Super. May 1, 2013) Wecht, J. (17 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a litigation associate for its office located in Hartford, CT. One to three years of experie...
Borteck & Czapek, P.C., based in Florham Park, is a boutique estates and trusts law firm specializing in estate planning and administrat...
Gwinnett County State Court is seeking an attorney to assist the Judge by conducting a variety of legal research, analysis, and document pre...