CRIMINAL LAW
Right to Counsel • Sufficiency of Evidence • Conspiracy • Active Participant • Overt Act
Commonwealth v. Smith, PICS Case No. 13-1047 (Pa. Super. May 1, 2013) Wecht, J. (17 pages).
The evidence proved that appellant was an active participant in the conspiracy and was sufficient to support the reasonable inference that damage to parked vehicles was caused by appellant during the chase, but the trial court prevented appellant from asserting which right he sought to invoke, i.e., whether he sought to assert his right to represent himself or to seek appointment of new counsel. Judgment of sentence vacated.
May 14, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
CRIMINAL LAW
Right to Counsel • Sufficiency of Evidence • Conspiracy • Active Participant • Overt Act
Commonwealth v. Smith, PICS Case No. 13-1047 (Pa. Super. May 1, 2013) Wecht, J. (17 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legal Administrative AssistantRivkind, Margulies & Rivkind, P.A.Miami, FL, USAEmployment Type: Full-TimeBenefits Offered: Medical, Retir...
Position Type:Administrative and Central Office Office Title/Functional Title:Risk Management and Litigation Associate Counsel - 23849Civil ...
Process enhanced rate equitable services requests, response to filers and NYSED Inquiries. Receive, file, coordinate, and review ...