CRIMINAL LAW
Right to Counsel • Sufficiency of Evidence • Conspiracy • Active Participant • Overt Act
Commonwealth v. Smith, PICS Case No. 13-1047 (Pa. Super. May 1, 2013) Wecht, J. (17 pages).
The evidence proved that appellant was an active participant in the conspiracy and was sufficient to support the reasonable inference that damage to parked vehicles was caused by appellant during the chase, but the trial court prevented appellant from asserting which right he sought to invoke, i.e., whether he sought to assert his right to represent himself or to seek appointment of new counsel. Judgment of sentence vacated.
May 14, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
CRIMINAL LAW
Right to Counsel • Sufficiency of Evidence • Conspiracy • Active Participant • Overt Act
Commonwealth v. Smith, PICS Case No. 13-1047 (Pa. Super. May 1, 2013) Wecht, J. (17 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking a attorney to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have at l...
Associate Attorney (Immigration Law) Position: Associate Attorney (Immigration Law) Location: Central NJ (Remote/Hybrid) Salary: $...