Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young argued in a recent filing it is entitled to judgment on the pleadings in a malpractice case brought against it by Sovereign Bank.
The law firm said Sovereign successfully argued in a separate court action that the loan agreement Stradley drafted for it protected Sovereign’s security interest in a loan. The bank can’t now argue Stradley failed to draft an agreement that protected those interests, the law firm argued in its motion for judgment on the pleadings in Sovereign Bank v. Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
