My individual practice has caused me to focus on mandatory injunctions under the environmental laws for a while now, as in United States v. NCR, No. 1:10-cv-910-WCG (E.D. Wis. May 1, 2013). That case, tried last December, resulted in a mandatory permanent injunction under Section 106(b) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §9606(b), which requires multiple responsible parties to comply with a unilateral administrative order for remedial action issued by the Environmental Protection Agency, jointly and severally.
Superfund practitioners may want to focus on that recent decision. Others may wonder whether a Superfund case, or any other federal case, is a useful model for environmental enforcement in the Pennsylvania courts.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
