Two state high courts ruled last week that the attorney-client privilege means that lawyers need not open confidential talks with their in-house counsel to clients bringing malpractice claims, as a third highest court prepared to mull the same question.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled on Wednesday in RFF Family Partnership LP v. Burns & Levinson. The next day, the Supreme Court of Georgia issued a similar ruling in St. Simon’s Waterfront LLC v. Hunter, Maclean, Exley & Dunn. Meanwhile, a case raising the same question against Davis Wright Tremaine was at the briefing stage before the Oregon Supreme Court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
