The Superior Court of Pennsylvania heard a matter of first impression regarding the distribution of frozen embryos in a divorce in the matter of Reber v. Reiss, 2012 Pa. Super. 86 (2012). As in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures and the like are becoming increasingly common, and the rate of divorce shows no signs of ebbing, the issues presented in Reber will continue to be quite relevant in the foreseeable future.
The parties in Reber were married in 2002. Unfortunately, the wife, Andrea Reiss, was diagnosed with fairly advanced cancer at the age of 36 in 2004. Due to her age and the detrimental effect intense cancer treatments (e.g., radiation and chemotherapy) can have on a woman's ability to procreate, the parties agreed to engage in IVF in order to ensure the greatest odds of allowing Reiss to have biological children after her ordeal with cancer was finished. The IVF procedure produced 13 embryos using the reproductive material from both parties and they were cryopreserved. In 2006, the husband, Bret Reber, filed for divorce, and during the course of the divorce litigation the parties agreed that frozen embryos are marital property subject to equitable distribution.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
