Inadequate notice of foreclosure under Act 91 does not deprive courts of subject-matter jurisdiction, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled.
The high court unanimously rejected the argument of appellee Pamela A. Vukman in Beneficial Consumer Discount v. Vukman that a defective notice under Pennsylvania Foreclosure Prevention, Act 91 strips the court of its subject-matter jurisdiction over the foreclosure proceedings, and determined that defective notice does not affect the jurisdiction of the court to hear the matter.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
