When it comes to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s ability to make timely rulings after hearing arguments, there is no consensus among the state’s legal community regarding the high court’s efficiency.
Some attorneys view the court’s performance as commendable given its workload and only recent addition of a seventh justice, while others are more critical, claiming the court takes too long to issue opinions and focuses on unnecessary activities.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
