Former state Rep. Brett Feese has failed to convince a federal judge that the Attorney General’s Office had destroyed evidence that could have kept him from being convicted on public corruption charges.
U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III of the Middle District of Pennsylvania held that the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1994 opinion in Heck v. Humphrey would preclude Feese from advancing that argument at this point because he is still pursuing appeals of his conviction in state court and has yet to prevail.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
