Instead of focusing on only a single subject, this month’s column reviews a series of recent developments likely to be of interest to appellate practitioners.
• Voters send mixed signals on judicial retirement age-related concerns: On Nov. 5, voters in New York defeated a proposed constitutional amendment that would have raised New York’s judicial retirement age from 70 to 80. That same day, however, Pennsylvania voters opted to retain two currently-serving state Supreme Court justices who will reach the mandatory retirement age before serving out their new 10-year terms.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
