A federal judge has allowed Philadelphia personal injury firm Larry Pitt & Associates to proceed with its Dragonetti Act and Lanham Act claims against competitor Lundy Law, and is permitting the Pitt firm to replead its claims alleging Lundy Law’s exclusive contracts to advertise on the outside of buses and other spaces violated antitrust laws.
In a Dec. 13 opinion issued in Larry Pitt & Associates v. Lundy Law, U.S. District Judge Cynthia M. Rufe of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania dismissed without prejudice the Pitt firm’s Sherman Act, unfair competition and tortious interference with contract claims, saying the plaintiff failed to show that Lundy Law’s exclusive advertising contracts with KYW radio, the Wells Fargo Center, SEPTA and another regional mass transit system were unlawful.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
