Prosecutors have taken strong issue with arguments made by ex-Penn State President Graham Spanier, which they characterized as “inaccurate” and “gratuitously disparaging.”
In papers filed March 7, but released by the Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas on Wednesday, the state Attorney General’s Office moved to strike a response to the state’s proposed findings of facts and conclusions of law that Spanier filed in February. The filing disputed the claim that prosecutors “‘manipulate[d] the record’ to hide the facts,” and questioned Spanier’s representation of Cynthia Baldwin, a key witness for the prosecution. The filing also questioned Spanier’s right to file any response to its proposed findings of facts.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
