Environmental lawyers are regularly called upon to translate science into language that judges, other lawyers, bureaucrats, businesspeople, journalists and all other sorts can understand. This may be the most important thing we do for clients.
Last year, our Supreme Court amended Comment 8 to Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1 expressly to require lawyers to become knowledgeable about “technology.” But the court probably had information technology used in practice in mind, not the issue that faces environmental lawyers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
