A Columbia County Court of Common Pleas judge won’t recuse himself from overseeing a medical malpractice suit that involves a man whom the judge had prosecuted in his former role as district attorney.

On March 14, Judge Gary E. Norton dismissed a motion for recusal in Matos v. Geisinger Medical Center after counsel for the medical center contended that Norton’s prosecution of the man who murdered the plaintiff’s decedent in an unrelated case several years prior to the civil action necessitated that Norton remove himself as judge. Norton opined that he had little recollection of his interactions with the man, and that the defendant’s motion was made as a bad-faith attempt to “judge shop.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]