Editor’s note: This is the second in a two-part series.
It has been more than 18 months since the American Bar Association amended its comment to Rule 1.1, pertaining to competence, to require that lawyers “keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology.” In my last column, we discussed how to learn about e-discovery, some general rules involving it and how to build a map of the data universe from which you will have to produce responsive documents and withhold privileged ones. In this month’s column, we will discuss the ethics of preservation and collection, searching and review.
Preservation and Collection
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
