A federal magistrate judge in Pittsburgh has imposed sanctions on a commercial defendant after a fruitless settlement negotiation.

Because Safety-Kleen has a policy of refraining from settling cases until the close of discovery, but it participated in a settlement conference before that time anyway, U.S. Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly of the Western District of Pennsylvania granted the plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions. She ordered the company to pay the attorney fees, costs and travel-related expenses that the plaintiffs paid to participate in the settlement conference in January.
”Safety-Kleen did not participate in the mediation process in good faith,” Kelly said, making clear in a footnote that the “sanctions are imposed solely based on defendant’s refusal to participate in good faith, not based on defendant’s refusal to settle.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]