An attorney who declined to undergo a chemical test following his arrest for allegedly driving under the influence will still lose his driver’s license for a year, even though he offered to alternatively take breathalyzer and urinalysis tests, the Commonwealth Court has ruled.

On Aug. 4, a three-judge panel of the court ruled in Nardone v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that attorney John D. Nardone’s actions constituted a refusal to submit to the chemical test, and therefore the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas erred in finding the attorney was exercising his rights under Section 1547 of the Vehicle Code.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]