A Pennsylvania company has filed a nine-count complaint against its longtime outside general counsel, Squire Patton Boggs, over allegations the firm was conflicted in representing the company and its sole founder and allegedly helped that founder inappropriately benefit from the company’s stock plan to the tune of millions of dollars.

In Alliance Holdings v. Squire Patton Boggs, filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on Oct. 10, Alliance and the trustee of its employee stock ownership plan said Squire Patton helped Alliance founder David Fenkell have nearly exclusive control over the company’s operations from 1995 until he stepped down in 2012. During that time, according to the complaint, Squire Sanders—which has since merged and become Squire Patton Boggs—represented a personal company of Fenkell’s that allegedly profited from Alliance. Squire Patton also represented other entities doing business with Alliance that allegedly paid what Alliance described in the complaint as “kickbacks” to Fenkell’s personal company rather than those fees going to Alliance.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]