Shifting legal arguments made on behalf of a medical device manufacturer that is facing a whistleblower suit have cost the company attorney fees for the plaintiff.
U.S. District Senior Judge Michael Baylson of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania didn’t agree with the plaintiff that the company’s conduct would rise to level of contempt, but he did agree that it would warrant payment of attorney fees related to the disclosure of a confidential recorded conversation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
