The target of a qui tam case can proceed with its counterclaims related to the use of confidential documents by the whistleblower, a federal judge has ruled.
Shortly after federal prosecutors declined to intervene in the case earlier this year, the company accused of defrauding the government—Surgical Monitoring Association—filed counterclaims for breach of contract, implied contract and promissory estoppel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
