The state Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments in a case over whether a state law prohibiting residential mortgage lenders from collecting excessive fees and charges should be applicable to a lender’s attorneys.
The justices granted allocatur in the joint cases Glover v. Udren Law Offices and Johnson v. Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg on Tuesday. The one-page per curiam orders in the cases limited the arguments to the issue of whether Act 6, Section 502 provides a remedy against any “person” collecting prohibited fees on behalf of a residential mortgage lender.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
