Wal-Mart’s internal investigation of injuries sustained by a patron of one of its Pennsylvania stores is not enough to prove the patron’s damages claim exceeded the $75,000 threshold required to get the case into federal court.

U.S. District Judge C. Darnell Jones II of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania sent the premises liability case of Stevenson v. Wal-Mart Stores back to the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas because the only evidence to show plaintiff Dorothy N. Stevenson’s alleged damages met or exceeded the $75,000 requirement for federal jurisdiction was Wal-Mart’s own estimate of Stevenson’s damages and her refusal to stipulate that her damages were lower.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]